With the Government committed to completing or at least pursuing further reform of the Lords the Society would welcome the memberships views on the issue.
1. Are you in favour of further reform of the House of Lords:
Yes No
2. If there is to be further reform do you favour:
Abolition Wholly elected Wholly appointed Part elected/part appointed Retention of the title House of Lords An alternative title
3. If you favour elected representatives do you favour: Proportional representation based on % achieved nationwide in elections for the House of Commons Proportional representation based on % achieved nationwhide in elections fospecifically for the House of Lords First past the post based on representatives for constituencies Other, please explain
4. At what time should elections be held? Same time as elections to the House of Commons Mid way through the Commons term Other time, if so please specify
5. How many representatives do you believe the Lords should contain?
6. If you believe the representatives of the Lords should be appointed who should appoint them:
Political parties obtaining a certain % of the vote in national elections An independent appointments commission The Government The House of Commons Other, please specify
7. Wha powers should the Lords have in relation to legislation?
The power of Veto The power to delay The power to scrutinise and return to the Commons Investigative powers, including the power to call ministers to give evidence Others, and if so what
8. Any other comments you wish to make on the issue of House of Lords reform:
Please return to David Williams, (Chair, Constitutional Affairs sub-committee) 4 Paper Buildings, Temple, EC4Y 7EX. LDE 1035. (dw@4pb.com)
Our 2007 AGM agenda (held on 6th December) read more >
Reform of the House of Lords, fill in our questionnaire read more >
Our latest newsletter for download read more >